ABSTRACT
Background: The impact of some antiretrovirals against SARS-CoV-2 infection and disease severity is conflicting. We evaluated the effect of tenofovir alafenamide/emtricitabine (TAF/FTC) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/emtricitabine (TDF/FTC) against SARS-CoV-2 infection and associated clinical outcomes among people living with (PLWH). Methods: We conducted a propensity score-matched analysis leveraging data from the PISCIS cohort of PLWH in Catalonia (Spain). We matched for TAF/FTC versus ABC/3TC in a ratio of 1:1, and 1:3 for TDF/FTC versus ABC/3TC, and TDF/FTC versus TAF/FTC. We used logistic regression to assess the association between tenofovir-based ART and SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis and associated hospitalisation. Results: In our entire cohort [median age: 46.1 years, 82.3% males], 7550 PLWH were being treated with TAF/FTC, 1020 receiving TDF/FTC, and 4135 receiving ABC/3TC. After propensity score-matching, SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis rates were the same in TAF/FTC versus ABC/3TC recipients (12.2% vs 12.2%, P=1.00);lower among TDF/FTC versus ABC/3TC recipients (9.7% vs 12.4%, P=0.05) with borderline significance;and lower among TDF/FTC versus TAF/FTC recipients (9.7% vs 12.6%, P=0.03). In well-adjusted logistic regression models, TAF/FTC was not associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.97;95% confidence interval [CI], 0.83-1.12) or associated hospitalisation (aOR 0.95;95% CI, 0.62-1.45). TDF/FTC compared to ABC/3TC, was not associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (aOR 0.81;95% CI, 0.61-1.07) or hospitalisation (aOR 0.49;95% CI, 0.14-1.27). TDF/FTC was not associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis (aOR 0.81;95% CI, 0.61-1.07) or associated hospitalisation (aOR 0.47;95% CI, 0.14-1.22) compared to TAF/FTC. Conclusion: TAF/FTC or TDF/FTC were not associated with reduced SARS-CoV-2 diagnosis rates or associated hospitalisations among PLWH. TDF/FTC users had baseline characteristics intrinsically associated with more benign SARS-CoV-2 infection outcomes. Tenofovir exposure or not should not modify the preventive or therapeutic SARS-CoV-2 infection management.
ABSTRACT
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review is to use the currently available clinical and epidemiological data, to identify key aspects to improve both the clinical management and public health response to SARS-CoV-2/HIV co-infection among HIV vulnerable populations and people living with HIV (PLWH). RECENT FINDINGS: While at the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the lack of robust information on SARS-CoV-2/HIV co-infection, prevented a clear picture of the synergies between them, currently available data strongly support the importance of common structural factors on both the acquisition and clinical impact of these infections and the relevance of age, comorbidities, and detectable HIV viral load as associated worse prognostic factors among PLWH. Although more information is needed to better understand the biological, clinical, and epidemiological relationship between both infections, a syndemic approach to prevent SARS-CoV-2 among HIV high-risk groups and PLWH, targeting these populations for SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and protocolizing early identification of PLWH with worse COVID-19 prognosis factors, is crucial strategies to decrease the overall impact of SARS-CoV-2 /HIV co-infection.